HURF Recipients

2022 HURF Recipients

Miles Berry

Major: Medieval Studies and Anthropology  Faculty Mentor: Gantt Gurley

Project Title: Gender Diversity in Medieval and Early Modern Scandinavia


My research aims to examine the notion of gender diversity in medieval and early modern Scandinavia to demonstrate that gender diversity had a place in a society that idealized masculinity and institutionalized slander around gender, used here to mean the internal experience one has with their identity and expression. Throughout the Icelandic Family Sagas and the mythic corpus, certain characters display gender deviation from their normative roles in society. Such figures include Guðmund the Powerful and Njal from the Icelandic Family Sagas and Loki and Odin from the mythic corpus.    For example, the concept of argr/ragr, and legal defamation around the masculinity of warriors. Argr and ragr have been routinely mistranslated as antiquated words like catamite or avoid the overtly sexual nature of the terms altogether by using words like “coward,” “sissy,” or “pervert.” Ragr is both a legal accusation that affects the social standing of a man and a state of being in medieval and early-modern Scandinavian cultures that needs to be explored, as it still exists in modern societies where it has lost none of the violent overtones. However prevalent/consistent this society’s conception of gender is represented in the literary sources, its presence in archaeology can be misleading.   Modern archaeological research has remained inconsistent concerning the evidence of gender diversity, particularly surrounding burials of early Scandinavians. Yet this incongruency has created opportunities for new research into medieval Scandinavian views on gender in society. Through this research, I will use primary texts, modern archaeological research, and pertinent secondary literature to create a more refined picture of gender diversity, masculinity, and its implications in archaeological evidence in Viking-Age burials. I expect to find what we would label as “gender diversity” today in every one of these areas of study, despite the term’s loaded modern and anachronistic nature. 

Jonah Gomez Cabrera

Major: Art and Art History  Faculty Mentor: Julie Weise

Project Title: Bracero Program and Consulates in California


The question that I am trying to research and gain further knowledge of is, how did the consulates in California and the Mexican government enforce the terms of the Bracero Program and how did they treat braceros? The Bracero Program was a deal begun between the United States and Mexico during World War II in a period of high demand for jobs and labor shortages and ended in 1964. This permitted men from Mexico to work in the United States, but with that came the association of Mexican labor becoming the new cheap labor and violations of their contracts by growers. There has been countless historical evidence that Mexican consulates have been in support of Braceros and against discrimination, however, due to the mass migration occurring in California during the Bracero Program, it overwhelmed consuls as well as the Mexican Government. This changed the dynamics between the governments, with Mexico losing their political leverage and control to protect Braceros’ contracts. By looking through official government documents from Mexican Consulates in California as well as from Mexico’s Secretary of Foreign Relations scanned by History professor Julie Weise, I will get to see what sort of interactions, thoughts, opinions, and actions they took either in favor or against Bracero workers. The expected conclusion for this in-depth research project would find the perspective of Consuls who had different expectations of the Bracero Program. It can also uncover the perspective of the Mexican Government and how they influenced certain decisions that Consulates might have enacted upon due to either personal bias or political pressure.  

Lisa Deluc

Major: Cinema Studies and English  Faculty Mentor: Andre Sirois

Project Title: A Sense Of the Salacious and the Scarring: Phenomenology in New French Extremity


This research will focus on a specific film movement that came out of France in the late nineties through the first decade of the twenty-first century known as New French Extremism or New French Extremity. Through my studies, I hope to better understand how affect functions within the visceral spectatorship experience of cinema. I propose that exposure to such films can only be fully understood and properly exercised through the scope of affect theory. By discerning how New French Extremism through the medium and form of film fosters the development of abstract traumatic affect, our understanding of phenomenology and the lived experience of the spectator in contemporary cinema can enlighten our subjective experience in a traumatizing world. I hope to finalize my work with an accompanying experimental video piece, and gallery exhibition that emulates the stimulation of affect, using the formal techniques found in New French Extremity films. 

Rowan Glass

Major: Anthropology  Faculty Mentor: Reuben Zahler

Project Title: Encounters on the Green Frontier: Social Change in Maynas in the Upper Amazon of Peru, 1542-1767


The social history of Maynas, a region of the Peruvian Amazon centered around the city of Iquitos, remains understudied and poorly understood, despite the status of Maynas as one of the most biologically and ethnically diverse corners of the Amazon Basin. This is particularly true of the area’s colonial history as told by the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors, missionaries, and administrators who were periodically active in the region from 1542, the year of the “discovery” of the Amazon River. The vast distances and inherent dangers involved in traversing and controlling this remote territory meant that its colonization was considerably more gradual and piecemeal than elsewhere in the Americas. For the Indigenous peoples of Maynas, this meant that episodes of contact with colonizers were often infrequent and irregular, although by no means did their societies remain unchanged over the long process of colonization. Historians of Maynas, however, have had little to say about processes of social change throughout the contact period. I propose to address this dearth in the literature through an analysis of said processes as they are apparent in the major primary sources on the region, from 1542 to the expulsion of the Jesuits from Spanish America in 1767. This timeframe covers the period of greatest colonial activity in Maynas prior to the independence period, as, after 1767, colonizers would not return en masse until the quinine and rubber booms of the mid-late nineteenth century. This research will contribute to a greater understanding of sociohistorical dynamics in this region, one which will be useful in comparative application to other situations of contact, social change, and resilience in colonial contexts, and which also points to a broader question: What happens when cultures clash—and how do societies respond to the irreversible processes of change that ensue?  

Alexis Han

Major: Global Studies  Faculty Mentor: Kristin Yarris

Project Title: Constructing Belonging: An In-Depth Analysis of Oregon’s Sanctuary Movement


In the 1980s, churches in Oregon and across the nation declared themselves sanctuaries for Central Americans fleeing civil conflict. This marked the beginning of the sanctuary movement, a religious and political campaign to assist migrants seeking safety in the United States. This movement made its way into the political sphere in 1987 when Oregon became the first state to pass a sanctuary policy which limits the use of local law enforcement to apprehend undocumented immigrants.   With recent growth in anti-immigrant sentiments, the Oregon sanctuary movement has resurged through the work of immigrants’ rights activists and legislators who recently passed the Sanctuary Promise Act, closing existing loopholes in police cooperation with federal immigration initiatives.   Despite being an important case study in state-level immigrant incorporation, Oregon’s sanctuary movement has received little attention from scholars. My research project will document how sanctuary movement actors define and express ‘sanctuary’ to resist exclusionary federal policies and cultivate belonging in their communities.  In researching the many dimensions of sanctuary, from social movement to policy, I will be taking a multi-disciplinary approach to answer these research questions:  1. How has the Oregon sanctuary movement evolved from its origins in faith-based activism? 2. How does Oregon’s sanctuary policy and the work of sanctuary and immigrants’ rights activists intersect to cultivate belonging for undocumented people?  I am using the Dedoose software to qualitatively analyze interviews with sanctuary activists and analyzing Oregon’s sanctuary policy within its political and social contexts. Preliminary analysis indicates that religious and political beliefs are key motivators in the work of sanctuary movement actors. This research will show how activists and legislators respond to one another to spur social and political change. Drawing on social science and legal studies, this project explores the humanistic concept of a shared humanity for all despite legal status.

Kelly Keith

Major: English  Faculty Mentor: José Cortez

Project Title: Legal Reasonability and The "Gay Panic" Defense


On May 13th, 2021, Senate Bill 704 was passed in Oregon. The bill banned the use of the ‘Gay Panic Defense,’ an affirmative defense that could reduce a murder charge if the defendant was found to commit murder under “extreme emotional disturbance” onset by the victim’s perceived homosexuality. The Gay Panic Defense reinforces anti-queer rhetoric that those who identity as LGBTQ+ deserve less legal and social protection than those who identify as heterosexual. The defense is still permitted in 36 states.   In criminal proceedings, a defendant’s culpability is assessed through a legal fiction known as the Reasonable Person Standard (RPS), which establishes a supposedly objective standard of behavior based upon how a hypothetical person would exercise conduct in a given situation. I propose to analyze the history of Oregon’s Gay Panic Defense as an entry into a broader discussion about how the legal fiction of the Reasonable Person Standard informs the persistence of the Gay Panic Defense beyond Oregon. Specifically,  I’ll be analyzing primary source court cases–– State v. Hayse and State v. Harmon––through archival, ethnographic, and historiographic research methods. If the Reasonable Person Standard is founded on a fictive approach to reasonability, how does reasonability itself, as a discursive practice exemplified in the Reasonable Person Standard, produce legal practices that affect LGBTQ+ in Oregon?  Ultimately, this project proposes an inquiry into how LGBTQ+ people have historically accessed justice in Oregon. By analyzing the RPS that informs the Gay Panic Defense, I aim to interrogate the continuing necessity of the RPS in criminal proceedings. Additionally, it interrogates how the law has framed the dignity, personhood, and liberty of People of Color, Women, and LGBTQ+ peoples. 

Ava Minu-Sepehr

Major: Cultural Anthropology  Faculty Mentor: Melissa Graboyes

Project Title: Zanzibari Understandings of Rebound Malaria and Acquired Immunity


With support from this fellowship, I will spend the next 6 months analyzing 40 Swahili/English interviews conducted with Zanzibaris about the island’s malaria history and local perceptions of malaria. This project weaves together contemporary interview data and historical context (drawn from previously collected archival sources) to present “vernacular knowledge,” about malaria, rebound malaria, and the linked concept of acquired immunity. By highlighting local forms of thought this project will also lead us to ask important epistemological and ethical questions, such as what types of knowledge are valued and disseminated, and how the work of decolonizing African Studies and African history can be performed.  Zanzibar’s history of contact and colonization, it’s relatively isolated environment as a semi-autonomous island, and its status as a testing ground for malaria interventions make it an ideal place for this study. Over the past century, periods of intense malarial interventions reduced malaria tremendously, while subsequent withdrawals led to dangerous rebound epidemics. This research fills an important gap--adding historical knowledge to contemporary public health debates--as local understandings of malaria, and related concepts, are rarely fully presented.   I will be working with the English translations of the interviews and English-language archival sources, but I will be exposed to detailed language analysis in Swahili, led by the senior co-authors (Graboyes and Meta). My role includes working cooperatively with another undergraduate student to clean, thematically organize, code, and analyze the translated interview data while reading heavily about Zanzibar’s history to assist in drawing the interview data together with the historical, archival, sources.   This work is part of a larger NSF grant led by Professor Melissa Graboyes on the history of malaria in Africa. The team of 4 people includes: Graboyes; Judith Meta, a Tanzanian public health expert who conducted the interviews; and another undergraduate research assistant. 

José Alfredo Ortiz-Angeles

Major: Philosophy and Romance Languages  Faculty Mentor: Michael Stern

Project Title: Decolonialism and its Futures: Examining the Growth of Decoloniality in Négritude and its Successors


The purpose of my project is to examine the theorists and writers of the Négritude movement and the development of their intellectual lineage through contemporary expressions of decolonial thought. I will explore the intellectual and historical environment in which the early decolonial thinkers such as Aimé Césaire, Frantz Fanon, Léopold Senghor, and their intellectual successors, developed decolonial, non-European thought. The Négritude movement is well recognized by thinkers of African and Caribbean thought—such as Édouard Glissant and Achille Mbembe—as the initial formations of a school of thought that works to dismantle an Eurocentric framework used to describe and categorize non-White beings according to hierarchical, Eurocentric principles. The Négritude period was significant in laying the groundwork for a future re-imagined through a decolonial process that restructures our thought according to a plurality of traditions, not simply the singular, monolithic European tradition. The later authors I mentioned above—Glissant and Mbembe—are both of immense importance in looking back at the thinkers and writers of the Négritude movement and critically expanding on their projects of creating a decolonial future. An examination of the later author's critical engagement with the Négritude movement—as well as an account of the disagreements among members of the Négritude movement itself—is necessary for understanding how our own development of decolonial thought can be achieved through a critical examination of Négritude and a profound engagement with their intellectual successors. I identify the primary objective of this project as reaching an understanding of how the critical engagement of the later authors, including past thinkers opposing Négritude, can uncover the means by which a decolonial future is made possible. 

2021 HURF Recipients

Starla Chambrose

Major: History and Biology  Faculty Mentor: Arafaat Valiani

Project Title: A History of Muscular Dystrophy: The Biosocial Nature of Disease


The Human Genome Project (HGP) signaled the beginning of a paradigm shift in biomedicine; as a result of the project’s completion, our understandings of sickness and health have increasingly shifted from a “molar” (i.e. visible) to a molecular level. This turn to genetics has altered not only the way we discuss the cause of disease, but also our understanding of what qualifies as a disease, and, ultimately, what it means to be “cured.” Accordingly, my research studies the evolving narratives of “disease” and “cure” in the history of muscular dystrophy from the 19th century to the present. What did it mean to have (and treat) muscular dystrophy before scientists began to fully characterize its genetic basis, and how do these answers differ now in the post-genomic age? Addressing these questions adds to a growing body of literature that argues that genetic diseases like muscular dystrophy are shaped by both biological and social factors. By considering the sociomedical aspects that have shaped conceptions of this group of muscle diseases, my research provides an important humanistic perspective that is currently absent in the literature. This type of integrative research requires a methodological approach that relies on a unique blend of sources—both medical journals and works by medical anthropologists and historians who have written about disease and cure—to move muscular dystrophy beyond the biomedical into a cultural context.

Cassie Cole

Major: Public Relations  Faculty Mentor: Donnalyn Pompper

Project Title: A Culture to Call Home: Cultural Gatekeeping in the Vietnamese Community


My research will answer the central question: how is modern racial gatekeeping expressed in those of Vietnamese descent? I will be creating an anonymous survey to ask participants about their own experiences with gatekeeping, as well as questions about their thought processes and background in regards to the race and culture they are a part of. The survey will be posted on a Facebook group with thousands of Vietnamese-identifying members from different parts of the world and different lived experiences. The data collected will answer my research questions both in terms of the gatekeepers and those who are being kept out of a race they identify with, while providing multiple perspectives. I will also use my findings to create a new definition of racial gatekeeping, according to participants in my survey that explain their gatekeeping thought processes. Using the hermeneutic phenomenological technique, I will study the lived experiences of my participants equally and without bias, and analyze my research to create conclusions about gatekeeping behavior and patterns found within this phenomenon. I expect to find patterns within my data that will provide insight on both sides of racial gatekeeping.

Bita Habashi

Major: English  Faculty Mentor: Kara Clevinger

Project Title: The Representation of Middle Eastern Women Writers in High School Curricula


For the purpose of my research, I am posing the question which woman writers of Middle Eastern descent can be added to and taught in high school Language Arts curriculums? As preliminary review of local curricula reveals no such authors, I will focus on who they are, where we can find them, looking into what novels will be introduced to make the curriculum more inclusive, and questioning why this is significant to students in the school system as well. I will be conducting research to identify, analyze, and amplify women writers of color and narrow down those who come from Middle Eastern descent. From here, my hope is to compile a reading list of 10 novels by women writers of Middle Eastern descent and do a close reading of 3-4 of them using popular genres and themes already common in high schools curricula, such as the dystopian novel, the coming of age novel, and novels including religious or spiritual themes. Previous research about gender normativity and feminism in high school curriculum has been conducted by Lauren Colley in “(Un)Restricting Feminism: High school students‘ definitions of gender and feminism in the context of the historic struggle for women‘s rights”, discussing feminist and gender normative un-teaching in high school, specifically in the realm of Social Studies curriculum, leading to the creation of women‘s history coursework, identifying the struggles and significance of women and women of color throughout history. My research will add to her work, which discusses Social Studies curriculum. My goal is to identify the struggles and significance of women of color in the Language Arts curriculum, and to work to incorporate women of Middle Eastern descent into a curriculum that avoids them.

Abigail Kellems

Major: Music Composition  Faculty Mentor: Roberty Kyr

Project Title: American Women Driving Classical Music and Environmentalism Forward in the Twenty-First Century


In America today, women are dramatically underrepresented in the field of music composition. The barriers and biases that prevent them from attaining the same opportunities as their male peers also put them at higher risk of physical harm and loss of income when a climate-change related disaster strikes. The purpose of this paper is to identify how six modern female composers of classical music in America are combating both of these issues, by innovating classical spaces and creating music that is rooted in environmentalism. I gathered information for this project from articles, interviews, composers’ personal websites, and analyses of their works. I discovered that while many of these women write music on environmental themes, others focus on sustainable composition and performance practices. Some use their talents and platforms to raise funds for environmental organizations, and to amplify the voices of climate change experts. Each of these women has a unique way of protecting the planet, so that all the progress that they have made working in the classical music industry will still be there for the women who succeed them. Their work is inspiring audiences and the next generation of composers into activism, and shows the world that women have an integral place in classical music and in creating a more sustainable future

Sabrina Piccolo

Major: Linguistics, Spanish  Faculty Mentor: Melissa Baese-Berk

Project Title: Effect of accent perception on the perception of professionalism


This study explores how people’s perceptions of speakers’ accents may be related to their perceptions of speakers’ professional characteristics. In this study, 256 online participants listened to two speakers, one with an accent common for a native Spanish-speaker in Oregon and one with an accent common for a native monolingual English-speaker in Oregon, discussing Mexican history or marine biology. Each speaker was described as an expert or nonexpert in the topic. Participants then rated how they perceived each speaker’s professionalism, confidence, believability, knowledgeability and level of experience.

On average, participants rated the speaker with the English-speaking accent higher in professionalism and confidence than the speaker with the Spanish-speaking accent. However, participants tended to rate the speaker with a Spanish-speaking accent higher than the speaker with an English-speaking accent in knowledgeability and experience when the speaker was presented as a nonexpert discussing Mexican history. These results suggest ways that perceptions about accents can affect assumptions made about speakers. Considering that accent perception may influence perceptions of character traits that are prioritized in professional settings, these results highlight the importance of acknowledging and challenging those assumptions in situations where unjust perceptions of a speaker can result in biased and harmful decisions, such as in job interviews, education and courtrooms.

Kira Seretan

Major: Linguistics Faculty Mentor: Vsevolod Kapatsinski

Project Title: Split Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Study of Truncation Patterns in American English


On average, participants rated the speaker with the monolingual accent higher in professionalism and confidence than the speaker with the bilingual accent. However, participants tended to rate the speaker with the bilingual accent higher than the speaker with monolingual accent in knowledgeability and experience when the speakers were presented as nonexperts discussing Mexican history. These results suggest ways that perceptions about accents can affect assumptions made about speakers. Considering that accent perception may influence perceptions of character traits that are prioritized in professional settings, these results highlight the importance of acknowledging and challenging those assumptions in situations where unjust perceptions of a speaker can result in biased and harmful decisions, including in job interviews, classrooms and courtrooms.

Jude Stone

Major: Political Science Faculty Mentor: Alison Gash

Project Title: Racial Influence on Trans-femme Murder Convictions


Trans-femme people of Color are currently the demographic most likely to be murdered in the US Their marginalized identities of race, gender, and Queerness intersect in such a way that many US institutions inflict systems of oppression upon them. The legal system in particular devalues these people’s lives and has a significant impact on their rights because it relies on the precedent of previous rulings to determine future case verdicts and even governmental policy. Accordingly, every case that undermines Trans-femme people’s social worth further cements the precedent of disregarding their cases. This paper examines how race and Queer identities interact in the court of law. Specifically, it explores how race impacts the degree of conviction and whether hate crime charges are applied to violence against Trans-femme people depending on both the victim’s and perpetrator’s race. BIPOC are more likely to face harsher sentencing than their White counterparts, so I am investigating if society’s contempt for the stereotype of the hyper-masculine, violent BIPOC man supersedes its disgust for Trans people’s defiance of gender roles, particularly when examining how their race shapes the public’s perception of them. To answer these questions, this project reviews news articles, court transcripts, and carceral databases while engaging with several OutCrit theories.

Maya Ward

Major: Political Science Faculty Mentor: Krystale Littlejohn

Project Title: Section 1557: Cultural Implications of the ACA for Transgender Persons


This research looks primarily at a comparison of Section 1557 of the ACA under the Obama and Trump administrations to see how language use affects outcomes of healthcare for transgender persons. Using a discourse analysis and the Dedoose software I examine language frequency and use of ten key words in Section 1557 including its comment and response under the Obama and Trump Administrations, and then found the most holistically representative examples of each word to specifically analyze using a discourse analysis approach. While the Trump Administrations uses blatantly hateful language, the Obama administration by not laying out clear frameworks for protection or accountability leaves room for discriminatory practices in the infrastructure. To provide quality access to healthcare for transgender persons strict language around discrimination, patient protection, insurance costs, and proper identification need to be enforced. Healthcare for transgender people is abysmal, and policy must be carefully analyzed in the future to ensure a progression towards quality care that all persons deserve access to, with a specific focus on the promotion and inclusion of transgender voice in the policy making process.

2020 HURF Recipients

Daisy Burge

Major: History  Faculty Mentor: Lindsay Mazurek

Project Title: Sexed Bodies, Sexless Souls: The Debate Over Women’s Bodies and Minds in Greco-Roman Antiquity


This project explores how Classical Greek philosophers and medical writers explained the female body and how their ideas affected perceptions of female identity and women’s roles in classical antiquity. In Greek and Roman societies, women were seen as deformed versions of men, naturally servile, and unable to exercise free will. Supposedly scientific understandings of female anatomy within antiquity – laid out by Hippocratic, Platonic, and Aristotelian thinkers – cemented these ideas and created a biological justification for the rigid patriarchal norms of the Classical and Hellenistic Mediterranean. Though there is a general understanding within contemporary scholarship that women existed in a rigidly gendered culture, less attention has been paid to how prevailing scientific ideas about women’s bodies intervened in discussions of gender in classical antiquity. 

To address this gap, this project provides a critical gendered analysis of key medical and philosophical texts from Classical Greece and the late Roman Empire that argue for female incompleteness in their interpretation of gender. In particular, this project will focus on the contrasting Platonic and Stoic views with those of later Aristotelian and early Christian authors on the female soul and mind. While Plato in the Republic asserted that women’s souls were sexless and that they, therefore, could be educated like men, Aristotle asserted that every aspect of women, including their soul and mind, was inferior to that of men. These ideas were reflected in many works of later Greek and Roman writers, including the works of later Roman and early Christian writers Musonius Rufus, Galen, and Augustine of Hippo. In understanding how dominant social forces perceived the female body and mind as inadequate, this project seeks to advance our understanding of disparate bodies of ancient scientific thought worked together to construct discriminatory social mores and practices.

Gracia Dodds

Major: Sociology and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies  Faculty Mentor: Judith Raiskin

Project Title: The Linguistic Implications of the Discourse of Sexuality in Southern Oregon Lesbian Lands


The 1970’s and 80’s held tremendous significance in the history of women’s intentional living communities. In Southern Oregon, lesbian lands popped up along the rural portions of the I-5 corridor, running from Eugene to Northern California. These lands served as women’s-only communities that were largely self-sufficient and created an entire subculture of a lesbian network that spanned across the United States. The mid-late 1970’s were a period of revolution due to the uptick in second-wave feminism and the gay liberation movement, and these lands served as an intersection right in the middle of these two issues. Lesbian separatism was a radical and controversial political strategy that deserves more thought than it’s been given in the academic sphere.

I am interested in understanding how women on these lands talked about and understood sexuality and the identification markers of women who loved women. The queer community as we know it is ever-evolving in its understanding of acceptable linguistic terminology, and it is worth understanding where that language began. The Southern Oregon lesbian lands gives insight into one of the first geographic spaces where same-gender attraction could be freely and candidly discussed. I hope to understand and better categorize how sexuality was understood and what linguistic terms meant in the context of their era. In my initial research, I have found that the term ‘lesbian’ is better understood as a catch-all word for all of women’s same-gender attraction– meaning that includes multi-gender attracted women. This research will give better insight into how umbrella terms, like lesbian, affect who is included (and excluded) in both the 1970’s and 80’s, and in current times. This linguistic evolution will give important context to why certain terms are used and what the implications of those uses are.

Katelyn Jones

Major: Art History Faculty Mentor: Nina Amstutz

Project Title: The Use of Fashion in the Portraits of John Singer Sargent


I have found myself captivated by the female portraits of the nineteenth century American painter, John Singer Sargent, as I am sure many viewers have. My captivation is prompted by elegant posing, soft features and elaborate dress. It is in this visually compelling display of contemporary fashion that I find a point of fascination and an angle in need of investigation. Sargent’s close relationship with Carolus-Duran and the impressionist painters influences his bright palette and loose brushwork in the surroundings and clothing of his sitters but while Sargent was bordering on the avant-garde radical in both technique and modernist associations, he believed strongly in the established academic tradition and the Salon where he was frequently well-reviewed. This ambiguousness in identity that we see in Sargent’s blend of classicism and modernism, is an ambiguity that repeats itself in the artist’s life such as his desire to remain an American citizen although he was raised in Europe or his close relationship with the nineteenth century queer community. I strongly believe Sargent’s portraits offer more than just flattering images of elite modern women, they can reveal a contemporary understanding of the identity politics of his age. With this in mind, how, if at all, does Sargent’s own conception of identity project onto his portrayal of these enchanting women? Fashion is often the centerpiece of his portraits with fabrics that have a nervously animated quality and in many circumstances were selected by the artist himself. Sargent’s use of fashion could reveal a fascinating understanding of contemporary gender and social identity. With this research I aim to answer how Sargent uses fashion as a means of conveying and reflecting ideas about identity in nineteenth century Europe and North America.

Ryan Cooper

Major: English  Faculty Mentor: Priscilla Ovalle

Project Title: Genderqueerness in Contemporary Horror Films


As a film genre, horror is known for its complicated construction of gendered bodies on the screen, from its grotesque depictions of the monstrous to the often-fearful movement of its protagonists from frame to frame. Feminist film critics like Carol Clover (author of Men, Women, and Chainsaws, 1992) and Barbara Creed (author of The Monstrous Feminine, 1993) have previously worked to name the phenomena that underline these depictions of gender in horror films. But by focusing on bodies through a heteronormative lens, they fail to consider what depictions of gender outside the binary might look like. This oversight leaves a significant gap in scholarly work that addresses the social significance of filmmakers expressing the inbetweenness of gender as either othering or liberating to viewers.

This project investigates the ways in which genderqueerness, or the in-between of gender, is constructed and expressed in contemporary horror films such as Tomas Alfredson’s Let The Right One In (2008) and Paul Schrader’s 1982 remake of Jacques Tourner’s Cat People (1942) in order to understand the social attitudes and significance of genderqueer expression in horror films. By close reading and analyzing these films using queer theory and media theory, I dialogue with scholars like Clover and Creed as well as queer studies works like Kate Bornstein’s Gender Outlaw (1995) and Riki Wilchins’ Genderqueer (2002) in order to consider the social significance of these constructions. As I connect these films to their social implications, I argue that binary approaches in critical horror film analysis ultimately limit the audience from seeing and naming the multitudinous, varied depictions of gender expressed on the screen. It is imperative that we create scholarly work that considers and challenges the boundaries of heteronormative film readings in order to make media studies (and the humanities as a whole) a more inclusive, generative space that pushes critics and readers alike to pursue more comprehensive textual analyses.

Alex Har

Major: Journalism and Public Relations  Faculty Mentor: Dean Mundy

Project Title: Strategic Communications at Rajneeshpuram


Rajneeshpuram was a commune in central Oregon that was supported by the followers of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, an Indian guru practicing experimental therapy and a quasi-religion. The commune quickly came into conflict with the nearby retirement town, Antelope, and later the greater Oregon community of Wasco County, state courts, federal courts, and opposition organizations. The Rajneesh movement dominated the news, and the constant updates and statements put out by the Rajneesh press office, newspapers, and spokespersons meant the Rajneesh were covered constantly in the news. There is evidence that suggests that the commune acted purposefully to attract news for strategic gains. My central research question is: how did Rajneeshpuram use strategic communication to garner free publicity and what was the role of sensationalism in attracting free news coverage?

Using UO’s Special Collections Rajneesh Archive, I plan to analyze news stories in the form of newspaper clippings, magazines, notes from reporters covering Rajneeshpuram, Rajneesh ephemera, manuals, brochures, and any current Rajneeshee literature. I plan to look specifically for new stories that were sensationalist in coverage by analyzing headlines, bylines, leads of articles, and the language surrounding the commune. I also plan to analyze new stories that were made sensationalist by the members of the Rajneesh movement through sensationalist tactics by analyzing the language and content used by the Rajneesh channels. I expect to conclude that the commune Rajneeshpuram wanted as much coverage as possible and learn more about the tactics used at Rajneeshpuram to gain free publicity.

Erin Sandvold

Major: English  Faculty Mentor: Heidi Kaufman

Project Title: Murderess in the Headlines


True crime intrigues people with its stories of unsettled mysteries, grotesque motives, and gruesome scenes. Murderers from over a hundred years ago, such as Jack the Ripper and H. H. Holmes, continue to draw public interest. As we seek to understand why people murder, we tend to overlook the way these murderers have been mythologized. In this project, I will study the way newspaper writing worked to invent murderers. While the majority of these criminals tend to be men, this project will instead consider two murderesses: Belle Gunness (1859-1908) and Amy Archer-Gilligan (1873-1962). On the surface, these women appeared to live ordinary and productive lives. Yet, in distinct ways, they both pushed against the societal norms of domestic femininity to become sensational figures in the American press. This project will examine the ways the press constructed these murderesses for public consumption. How, for example, did the papers bring together contemporary understanding of criminality and femininity?

Tucker Engle

Major: English  Faculty Mentor: Forest Pyle

Project Title: Cultural Hyperobjectivity: From Shelley to the 21st Century Instagram User


My work of undergraduate research seeks to perform a comparative and analytical study of the romantic poetry of the 19th century, in particular that of Percy Bysse Shelley, with contemporary literature and digital texts of today. Examples of contemporary texts my project will examine are the 2018 film Eighth Grade (dir. Bo Burnham), the 2017 poetry book Nature Poem by Tommy Pico, and Douglas Rushkoff’s 2013 work Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now, among others. I will bring the cultural and literary criticism of the 20th century in as an intermediary between these two distinct literary eras and traditions. Beyond this purpose of acting as a temporal intermediary, the foundation of this project in literary theory will empower this project to interpret and go beyond reputable, established cultural theory written in different contexts. I will focus on the work of the critical work of theorists such as Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Giles Deleuze, and Fredric Jameson. Each of these moving parts will be strung together by Timothy Morton’s concept of hyperobjects and ecological thinking. My work will show how the technologies which produce culture today have created numerous hyperobjects which pervade the production and interpretation of contemporary narratives and subjects. The relationship with self and culture experienced in the romantic period has erupted to exist everywhere in the Internet age. Through the method building on the work of the 20th century cultural theorists and Shelley’s poetry, I will begin to piece together what that means for the 21st century reader and critic.

Momo Wilms-Crowe

Major: Political Science  Faculty Mentor: Dan Tichenor

Project Title: Cultivating Self-Determination: Food Sovereignty as a Challenge to Neoliberal Coloniality in Puerto Rico


Food sovereignty – the right of communities to define and control their own food and agricultural policies – has increasingly become a rallying call for a particular strain of food justice activism around the globe. Going beyond a focus on food security, food sovereignty invokes an explicitly political critique of the larger structures producing cases of food injustice, especially neoliberalism, free-trade policies, and capital-intensive industrial agriculture. Advocating for democratic control and a greater distribution of wealth, knowledge, power, and land, food sovereignty work through agroecology is a key avenue for political resistance to neoliberal coloniality as it appears in Puerto Rico today, a site where food has been a key means of colonial control and subjugation. Cultivating self-reliance through attention to food production thus carries radical political implications and can be understood as part of a broader struggle for democratic self-determination, visible especially in the post-Maria context and highlighted by the #RickyRenuncia protests that marked the summer of 2019. My thesis explores these dynamics by working with grassroots organizations and agroecology collectives to see how the movement has operated as a direct challenge to deep-rooted conditions of coloniality — in both theory and practice — and how food sovereignty has been linked to larger questions of Puerto Rican political sovereignty and self-determination. My participatory ethnographic fieldwork also explores the intersectionality of the colonial experience as it relates to gender and sexuality and is framed theoretically by a feminist and queer decolonial perspective. This research fills a hole in the literature by applying decolonial and critical theory to a case study often overlooked in the field as a result of Puerto Rico’s complicated geopolitical relationship with the US.

2019 HURF Recipients

Cydnie Davenport

Major: Linguistics and Russian, Eastern European, and Eurasian Studies  Faculty Mentor: Melissa Baese-Berk

Project Title: Dialect Variation in English: An Investigation into the Disappearing Word Effect


Recent research (e.g., Dilley & Pitt, 2010) has demonstrated that manipulation of speech rate influences listeners’ perception of syllables in English. For example, when a sentence like Don must see the harbor or boats is spoken quickly, the underlined portion can blend together, creating an utterance that is ambiguous with a sentence like Don must see the harbor boats. Slowing down the surrounding speech rate (i.e., the non-underlined portion) can cause a listener’s perception of the sentence to switch from the harbor or boats version to the harbor boats version. This effect is driven by expectation: When listeners hear a slower speaking rate, they expect to hear fewer words than when they hear a faster rate. However, this result has typically only been investigated in “standard” American English, not in dialects that may differ in terms of their production and how they are perceived. That is, research has not yet considered how social context influences this effect. Specifically, by building on the previous results demonstrating a context speech rate effect we can delve into the effects of dialect variation.This project will ask how various dialects of American English impact the perception of syllables in conversational, every day speech. We plan to compare Southern speech with New York City speech. We anticipate that southern speech may be less susceptible to this effect because listeners expect Southern speech to be slower than New York City speech. This project is critically important because dialect information in someone’s speech can result in serious social judgements, and can also significantly impact how the speech is understood. Investigating how various dialects interact with cognitive mechanisms like this context speech rate effect can allow inquiry in how social factors and cognitive factors interact more generally speaking, allow us to better understand human communication.

Violet Fox

Major: Anthropology   Faculty Mentor: Lamia Karim

Project Title: “I can make people in my tears”: An Urban Anthropological Study of Homeless Women in Eugene Oregon


Why is there such an increase in homelessness, particularly among women, in the United States? I propose to study this phenomenon among homeless women in Eugene, OR. Recent scholarship and federal counts of homelessness show that the number of homeless people has been steadily increasing since the 1980s, with a sizable increase in women and their children. Research from Europe, Canada, and large U.S. cities show the insecurities that women face living on the streets. Oregon, in particular, has one of the largest homeless counts in the country, currently ranking fourth in the nation. Women’s unique social vulnerabilities and responsibilities as caregivers make homeless their experiences an important site of study in order to understand the causes of homelessness, as well as to offer pragmatic solutions. This is an urban anthropological research project that is composed of (a) archival research on policy changes from 1980s onward in Eugene; (b) oral histories from 5 homeless women as to the causes of their homelessness: and (c) interviews with the directors of three homeless shelters in the city of Eugene.

The objectives are to examine the causes of women’s homelessness in America, Oregon, and Eugene, as well as analyze and give voice to the gendered experiences and impacts of homelessness on women. My preliminary reading of the literature shows that women experience homelessness due to domestic violence, inability to pay medical and rental bills, and mental illness. However, there are also women who never expected to be homeless due to middle-class lifestyle that they lost unexpectedly. My research will explore key reasons for homelessness in Eugene, OR as well as compare how homeless women navigate between the unstructured street life and the highly structured shelter life, and if that is a handicap to their transition to assimilation into the housed world.

Alice Harding

Major: History   Faculty Mentor: Lindsey Mazurek

Project Title: Migration in the Bronze Age Near East


This project will explore migration in the Bronze Age Near East. The Amarna letters—correspondence between the rulers of several Bronze Age kingdoms, notably Egypt and Babylonia—mention the movement of people such as craftsmen and royal women to other polities, illustrating the importance of migration for international relations. Despite these mentions, most scholarship focuses exclusively on Bronze Age kings and their priorities. This project aims to combine archaeology with literature to offer a new, more holistic approach. It will focus on four types of migrants often omitted from previous works: craftsmen, brides, forced migration (as of captives), and even gods.

These people’s perspectives differ noticeably from those of the kings—that is, the elite male view—that is most often discussed in relation to the world of the Amarna letters. These case studies can reframe our understandings of these groups: rather than being those making decisions and deciding their own movements, these groups were most often controlled by those with power. This project thus aims to re-examine narratives of Near Eastern mobility during the Bronze Age through these groups and their migrations, and offer new perspectives that complement existing histories.

Anika Nykanen

Major: English and Humanities   Faculty Mentor: Mark Whalan

Project Title: Literary Racialization: The Function of Children in Southern Gothic Literature


Children, who occupy a unique position as creatures of innocence in the American psyche, have haunted the pages of American Gothic literature from its inception, vulnerable figures in whom cultural and psychological anxieties find fecund ground. As such, they have featured critically in racial discourses as well, from slavery and abolition to Jim Crow and the Civil Rights movement. Gothic literature’s exploration of the dark, antagonistic elements of the human mind enables Southern Gothic writers to examine the violent underbelly of the American dream—the removal of indigenous peoples, slavery, and white supremacy—with unique license. This project will investigate how, within this critical context, relatively under-examined Modern Southern Gothic works such as Eudora Welty’s “Delta Cousins,” Richard Wright’s “Big Boy Leaves Home,” and William Faulkner’s “The Bear” reimagine American Gothic’s traditional depiction of race as “the specter of otherness” (Eric Savoy, “The Face of the Tenant: A Theory of American Gothic”) by portraying the racialization of children. From the foreclosure of black male childhood to the adopted innocence of white girlhood and the fraught figure of the mixed child, Gothic children become a device by which the South’s history of racism, playing out in the lives of literary children, is critically explored. I will examine the work of these authors with a variety of lenses—Gothic, historical, racial, and modernistic—looking at Teresa Goddu’s Gothic America: Narrative, History, and Nation, Fred Botting’s Gothic, Robin Bernstein’s Racial Innocence: Performing American Childhood from Slavery to Civil Rights, as well as the seminal Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination by Toni Morrison.

Ally Shaw

Major: Asian Studies and Linguistics  Faculty Mentor: Kaori Idemaru

Project Title: The Role of Intonation in Japanese Politeness


The purpose of this study is to examine linguistic relationships between phonetics (the way people sound) and politeness in Japanese. Prior studies investigated voice characteristics in Japanese deferential speech (addressed to persons of superior social status) and non-deferential speech (used with persons of equal or inferior status). They found that the Japanese language exploits phonetic features to express politeness (Idemaru et al, forthcoming). Their study, however, observed overall intonation for entire utterances. I propose to conduct a more detailed analysis of their data, by dividing utterances into meaningful phrases in order to determine where in a sentence intonation is employed to express politeness. Understanding how and where important social cues like politeness are embedded in speech is critical for understanding how communications work in Japanese society and also for developing language and cultural fluency, particularly for non-native language learners.

Traditional research on politeness typically focused on type of words and grammatical features used to communicate politeness in various languages. However, a new wave of research began examining other dimensions such as voice characteristics and gestures (e.g., Winter and Grawunder, 2012; Brown et al 2014; Idemaru et al., forthcoming) with the theoretical view that speakers employ multiple politeness strategies to ensure successful communication. Their results indeed demonstrate that multiple linguistic and non-linguistic features contribute to produce the intended meaning of politeness. This study attempts to advance these efforts further. I will use the same data analyzed in Idemaru et al. (forthcoming) to measure and analyze important acoustic features (pitch, intensity, voice quality) at critical regions within words or phrases. This study will yield a more accurate understanding of the phonetic basis for one of the most fundamental Japanese social cues – politeness.

Kendra Siebert

Major: Journalism and Advertising   Faculty Mentor: Peter Laufer

Project Title: An Exploration of Urban Art as Cultural Testimony Throughout Social Movements in Mexico City and Oaxaca


In recent years, urban art has grown increasingly prominent in the public sphere across both Mexico City and Oaxaca, but its roots reside back in the early 1920s and the time of the Mexican Revolution. From 1910 to 1920, the Mexican government jumpstarted the muralist movement out of concern with “defining a new ‘Mexican’ character,’ and unifying the nation of divided maderistas, carrancistas, villistas, zapatistas (etc.) into one of mexicanos. Yet this mission is regarded by many of today’s urban artists and other community members as inauthentic – a manipulation of art to influence an audience’s understanding of society and self. With this project, I am attempting to answer the following questions: Is art in today’s public space inherently political? Who are these works intended for? Do they potentially act as cultural testimony? And how do their funding sources serve to convolute the message this art tells, potentially manipulating the cultural identity of a place or people?

I have already conducted one round of in-person interviews with urban artists in both Mexico City and Oaxaca, and will be returning this winter to ask more questions that will yield a wider variety of perspectives. Note that these Interviews will continue to be conducted through a historical and political lens, and ultimately, my project will attempt to show the correlation between art and public discourse, and use these perspectives to challenge the notion that art in the public space is inherently democratic. In the tumultuous political landscape of today, now is as important a time as ever to reflect on the ways different communities use media to encapsulate their social climate and effect social change. I am looking forward to sharing my results – as well as digital photographs – through in a formal thesis defense and any relevant conference settings.

DeForest Wihtol

Major: English and Spanish  Faculty Mentor: Kate Myers

Project Title: Caliban Yisrael: The Jewish “Other” in Shakespeare’s The Tempest and The Merchant of Venice


This paper seeks to introduce and integrate new data into the centuries-long discussion of William Shakespeare’s portrayal of Jewish people in his literary works through intertextual and close reading of Shakespeare’s plays The Tempest and the Merchant of Venice, sections from the Old Testament and Jewish Tanahk, and primary documents discussing Jewish life during the Elizabethan era.

Shakespeare’s relationship to and views of Jewish people have been subject to scrutiny for centuries. However, almost all conclusions put forth in academia about Shakespeare and his ties to Elizabethan Jewish communities and anti-Semitism have been drawn from one work, The Merchant of Venice, which contains Shakespeare’s only explicitly Jewish character, Shylock (as well as his daughter, Jessica, although she later happily converts to Christianity). In this paper, I propose that Shakespeare has another Jewish character lurking in his plays, although his Jewishness is implicit, rather than explicit. In the first part of this paper, I will support the interpretation of Caliban from The Tempest as a Jewish-coded figure through cross-reading The Tempest with sections of the Old Testament, Tanahk, and the Merchant of Venice, as well as non-fiction testimonials from both Jewish and non-Jewish Englanders during the Elizabethan era. I will then use Caliban’s characterization as an entry point into re-interpreting and understanding the character of Shylock from the Merchant of Venice. Using both these plays alongside the other texts, I will bring cultural and historical context to these portrayals in order to explore a deeper understanding of the complicated and nuanced portrayals of Judaism in Shakespeare’s work and the dynamics of modern scholarship on Shakespeare’s relationship to Judaism.

Scott Zeigler

Major: English  Faculty Mentor: Gordon Sayre

Project Title: Antagonistic River: The Agency of Nature in Northwest Fiction


This research will evaluate the representation of the fictional Wakonda Auga River as a character in Ken Kesey’s 1962 novel Sometimes a Great Notion. By investigating Kesey’s personal journals and correspondence, I will show how Kesey took his native Oregon, the natural world in which he lived, and wrote it into his story. Rivers are traditionally viewed in English literature as a component of setting or as a metaphorical representation of some human dilemma. Occasionally, a fantastical work will give an element of nature agency by giving it human characteristics like speech or movement or some combination thereof. Yet, a river is a force unto itself, and it interacts with the human animal in its own ways, both positively and negatively. Ecocriticism offers a ground for exploring how rivers can be given agency without adding anthropocentric characteristics. Through the ecocritical theoretical lens, readers can evaluate the natural components of a text, understand the figurative or metaphoric meanings, and still read nature for its powerful literal meaning. I will use this lens to evaluate the text and show how Kesey represented the Wakonda Auga River in the novel as both a fictive place, one based on the actual Siuslaw River, and as a character in conflict with other characters in the story. By reading Sometimes a Great Notion in this way, readers gain access to the historical world of Kesey’s Oregon and the fictive world of an Oregon mill town in the 1960s, and they are encouraged to explore today the natural places associated with both.

2018 HURF Recipients

Becca Marshall

Major: Environmental Studies   Faculty Mentor: Kathryn Lynch
Project Title: Managing for Mushrooms? Commercial Wild Mushroom Harvesting in the Willamette National Forest


This research will examine the extent Willamette National Forest’s natural resource management policies affect commercial wild mushroom pickers in Oregon. The history of land ownership and management in the United States is wrought in controversy and tied to social justice – from the violent removal of Native Americans from their land to other public/private land battles, such as the recent Malheur Wildlife Refuge occupation. In the contiguous United States, public land accounts for over 40 percent of the total land area and in Oregon just over 30 percent. And the public is meant to be able to access and have a voice in the management of these lands according to the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Forest Management Act. This includes people who rely on public lands for their livelihoods – such as commercial, wild mushroom harvesters. There has been little investment in managing lands for mushrooms along with little research, inventory or basic monitoring by forest managers. Although researchers, such as McLain, Arora, and Jones, have written on wild mushrooms in the Pacific Northwest, scholarship is still in its infancy. This research will try to fill some of the research gaps concerning wild mushroom harvesters and land management in Oregon.  My research methods will include: a review of the literature on commercial wild mushroom harvesters and land management in the Pacific Northwest, a text analysis of the Willamette National Forest’s natural resource planning documents, and interviews (with wild mushroom harvesters and buyers, land managers, and experts in related fields). The management of our public lands for wild mushroom harvesters has larger implications for how we manage our forests sustainably and inclusively for all people. Moreover, the social problems within wild mushroom management, such as power imbalances, class and ethnic divisions, and ideological struggle, mirror large-scale environmental justice issues.

Jacqueline Huaman

Major: Asian Studies Program   Faculty Mentor: Kaori Idemaru
Project Title: Japanese Gendered Language and the Ideal Female Romantic Partner


The goal of my honors thesis is to explore how gendered language, or lack thereof, is utilized in Japanese society to perpetuate feminine ideals in the media. Specifically, I want to focus on how the ideal female romantic partner is portrayed in modern media through the use of language. Japanese has been considered a very gendered language. However, more recent research has questioned whether the description of gendered features in Japanese reflects language ideology or language reality. For example, in 2004, Janet Shibamoto-Smith investigated language and its use as a cultural model for romance, specifically looking at how language was used by the protagonists of romance novels in the 1980s and 1990s in Japan. Similarly, I want to explore how idol music and popular television shows serve as models for romance and ideal female partners in contemporary society. Following the methodology set up by Shibamoto-Smith, I will develop a retrospective study and a corpus study to investigate language use in the media of the 2000s and 2010s in order to analyze the linguistic representations of an ideal female partner. I expect to find the use of gendered markers, and lack thereof, to correlate with the type of ideal being portrayed in the media, as substantiated by the society in which this media exists.

Meg Rodgers

Major: Media Studies   Faculty Mentor: Erin Hanna
Project Title: The Anti-Heroine: an Emergent Television Character Trope


Television’s anti-heroes have long raked in high ratings and delivered audiences with devilishly corrupt but ultimately sympathetic viewpoints. Recent exemplars such as Tony Soprano, Don Draper, and Dexter Morgan are rarely ethical and far from heroic, which has led to a wide breadth of scholarship about male characters who skirt the boundaries between regular life and outlaw culture. For example, Brett Martin’s Difficult Men and Amanda Lotz’ Cable Guys explore masculinity on television that is predicated on breaking societal norms. What the existing scholarship fails to fully address—and where my research project intervenes—is a thorough analysis of the anti-heroine, a television genre that has grown rapidly in recent years.

My research launches from Kathleen Karlyn’s The Unruly Woman, an early examination of women in film and television who use humor to undermine patriarchal authority. Margaret Tally’s The Rise of the Anti-Heroine in TV’s Third Golden Age is the first text to explore the emergence of the anti-heroine. My project extends past Tally’s work to look specifically at how anti-heroines have become a dominate feature of quality television.

Quality television is a category that loosely refers to series with narrative complexity, high production values, and characters with psychological depth. My three case studies, Sex and the City, Veep, and Girls, are Home Box Office (HBO) productions. I focus on HBO productions because the single network allows me to draw on consistent industry information, viewership demographics, and critical accolades. The anti-heroines from my case studies might be difficult or even unlikeable—but they do address and challenge traditional femininity (whereas anti-heroes reinforce hegemonic masculinity). Do anti-heroines have more agency over their personal and professional lives than other leading ladies? What underlies America’s fixation with immoral women? These are just a couple of the questions guiding my preliminary research.

Matthew Stephens

Major: Environmental Studies   Faculty Mentor: Steven Brence
Project Title: Examining Personhood and Environmental Policy: Determining the Benefits and Risks of Granting Legal Rights to Non-Human Entities


This project aims to determine the overall effectiveness of the Whanganui River Settlement Claims legislation, the ethical veracity of its central tenant that aims to grant legal personhood to the Whanganui River, and whether this recognition and protection afforded to the Whanganui River should be utilized as a model for other nations in the effort to protect and preserve our natural landscapes, resources, and cultural heritage. Using the Whanganui River as a case study, I intend to determine the best and most effective means of protecting these personal relationships with the natural world. Should we grant them personhood? What are the dangers and pitfalls of such bold action? Incorporating these spiritual perceptions and ideologies will tremendously bolster the protections afforded our public lands and waters, while helping to shift our culture back to one that appreciates each individuals relationship with the natural world, and our species indelible connection to it. In order to preserve cultural belief systems and practices, the integrity of natural landscapes, and the shared benefits of the natural world, it is essential to determine places of spiritual, cultural, and environmental importance should be granted legal standing, and if not, what the most effective means of protection and recognition are.

Sam Beeker

Major: English & Comparative Literature  Faculty Mentor: Brendan O’Kelly
Project Title: Philosophy, Politics, and Paranoia: Pynchon and the Construction of the Postmodern Subject


Paranoia generally pathologized as an unproductive condition. Yet, paranoia itself is one of the most prominent tropes of the postmodern novel, the most quintessential example of this being Thomas Pynchon’s 1966 novel, The Crying of Lot 49. Drawing on Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s theorizations of paranoid knowing and reparative reading, my research will reparatively read paranoia as an alternative site of meaning making and knowledge production. By reading Pynchon’s novel for its attention to the “paranoid” sociopolitical climate of the 1960s in California, my research seeks to rethink paranoia within postmodern literary forms and landscapes as an epistemological method for posing questions about the political subject. I will construct a working definition of postmodern subjectivity operating within Pynchon’s novel in order observe how those notions of the subject inform our own troubling sociopolitical climate. My reparative definition of the paranoid subject may prove useful for navigating the politics of despair that imbue both contemporary understandings of postmodern subjectivity and those of the 1960s.

By means of literary analysis, archival, and publicly available research at the University of Texas at Austin, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Oregon, I will engage with critics’ and historians’ understandings of the 1960s in California as they gave rise to a revolutionary politics that remains in tension with itself today. This tension being the conflicting poles between revolutionary reinvention and historical remembrance and recovery that often define our conceptions of linear historical trajectory, or progress. These understandings of political subjectivity will remain useful when read alongside Pynchon’s understanding of the postmodern subject, especially as I engage with these thoughts, and their variations, across the Sunbelt states.

My research seeks to foster a dialogue about ongoing theorizations of subjectivity while rethinking the literary tropes of postmodernity within their gendered, philosophical, and political contexts.

Sarah Hovet

Major: English & Journalism   Faculty Mentor: Corbett Upton
Project Title: Sense of Place in Contemporary Female American Poets: Indigenous and Immigrant Voices


In current national discourse, what it means to be “American” has become a polarizing issue. In a country built on immigrant labor, the otherness of immigrants has become a point of extreme xenophobia, while indigenous culture continues to be erased. In this context, my research intends to explore the poetics of three Asian-American, Latinx, and indigenous American female poets to determine how they construct senses of place in contemporary America outside of the normative narrative, or, in the words of Wilbur Zelinsky, how these women “see beyond the dominant culture” and establish counter-places within it. Focusing on Louise Erdrich, Ada Limón, and Aimee Nezhukumatathil, poets well-recognized for the role of place within their work, this project will apply an array of lenses, political, environmental, and social, to determine the alternatives to American identity these poets provide. More specifically, since the female perspective tends to be overlooked in the dominant patriarchal discourse, this project will examine the intersections of ethnicity and gender in order to understand how these poets present a particularly social or communal sense of place. Critical sources include selections from Wendell Berry’s Home Economics; texts devoted to an indigenous sense of place, such as Louise Erdrich’s Books and Islands in Ojibwe Country and works by Leslie Marmon Silko and Winona LaDuke; and essays by Doreen Massey and Janice Monk that address the role of gender in the construction of a sense of place. The purpose of my research is to create a richer and more inclusive understanding of the spectrum of American identity in contemporary poetics.

2017 HURF Recipients

Bryce Sprauer

Major: International Studies and Spanish    Faculty Mentor: Dan Tichenor
Project Title: Current Cuban Migration: Manifestations of Political Privilege and Economic Violence

Abstract: How are policies and geopolitical relations between Cuba, Central America, and the United States generating a new increase of Cuban migration and what is the impact on both migrants and citizens of the nations involved? This question provides an exploration of the stark contradictions in economic and immigration politics in the region between these key sending, transit, and receiving states. On the one hand, more than any country in history, Cuba has experienced the longest and most severe economic sanctions than any other country by the U.S. embargo, currently lasting 56 years, causing indirect violence in the form of restricted access to medications and resources. On the other hand, Cubans are the only nationality in the world that the United States provides the exceptional privilege of automatic refugee status upon arriving in the United States. While there are a wide variety of economic and commercial sanctions on Cuba, there are also a multitude of U.S. policies that enable and encourage the immigration of Cubans, specifically working, educated professionals. These seemingly contradictory angles of geopolitics facilitate economic suffering and incentivize a “brain drain” with the aim of weakening Cuba’s socialist government and imposing a democratic society as defined by the U.S. For context, Guatemalans who are fleeing extreme cases of femicide, organized violence, and violent identity-based discrimination have their asylum requests accepted at a rate of 1.8% and are labeled by United States government entities as merely economic migrants; meanwhile, Cubans, leaving the island primarily for economic opportunity, receive an automatic, federally sanctioned status of “refugee” and are provided benefits such as work visas, healthcare, higher education scholarships, and eligibility to gain citizenship after residing in the United States for a year and one day. My research focuses on Cuban migrants as they pass through Central America, which reveals the contradictory nature of discrepancies in the treatment of immigrants for political reasons. My research is propelled by the ample requests from both Cubans and Mexicans for research on the political history that informs the recent migration of Cubans. The purpose of my research is to illustrate how both U.S. economic and immigration policies toward Cuba, including the current negotiations between Presidents Obama and Raul Castro, impact and shape the regional politics as well as reinforce the inequitable, if not discriminatory, effects on migrants from Central America, the very region that Cubans are passing through to get the United States.

Drew McLaughlin

Major: Linguistics     Faculty Mentor: Melissa Baese-Berk
Project Title: The Role of the Listener in Nonnative Speech Perception Research

Awards Related to this Research Project:

2017 Division of Undergraduate Studies Oral Presentation Award

Abstract: Difficulties in speech communication can be caused by a number of factors related to the speaker, the listener, or the environment. Reaching a shared understanding may be more challenging in a conversation between a nonnative speaker and a native or naïve listener (i.e., a listener who is unfamiliar with the accent of the non-native speaker), than it is between two speakers who share a language background. Since the 1980s, language researchers have investigated how nonnative accented speakers and native or naïve listeners overcome communication difficulties using a number of research designs. Here, I propose a review of nonnative speech perception experiments that examines how the listener is portrayed in the manuscript. Is the listener a participant used as a tool in the experimental design to measure qualities of the stimuli (i.e., representations of the nonnative speaker), or are the qualities of the listener—such as language background and cognitive skills—what is being measured? By examining the role of the listener in experimental design, previous research can be sorted into two design categories, which I refer to as tool and contributor frameworks. Observing the use of tool and contributor frameworks over time may provide important insight into whether previous research methodologies have approached the subject holistically

Eugenia Lollini

Major: Anthropology and Romance Languages   Faculty Mentor: Carol Silverman
Project Title: Before the Spectacle: Shaping Gender and Class in Beirut’s Beauty Salons

Abstract: “Beirut, in the words of one designer…is like a third world country that’s put on some makeup” writes Rima Suqi in a recent article in the New York Times. Indeed, scholars worldwide have coined Beirut the trendsetting beauty 68 city of the Middle East. Striking evidence for this [“this” here would refer to the nickname, not the phenomenon itself includes 2007 National Bank of Lebanon billboards advertising plastic surgery loans and long lines of women waiting outside beauty salons every weekend. Contemporary discourse on the popularity of beauty work in Lebanon is often explained by the reaction to the Lebanese Civil War, and by individualistic attitudes celebrating life, glamour, and living in the moment. However, such assumptions overlook the extent to which familial and social networks constitute the body in Beirut’s interconnected and visual society. My research explores: 1) How social pressure from family members and close friends to engage in beauty work supports the patriarchal family structure; 2) How beauty work in Beirut can become a medium of social distinction among different classes of women; 2) How beauty work may contribute to or resist women’s subordination in society. To complement my salon research, I also examine how public sites such as nightclubs and bars influence the type of beauty work done in salons. In order to achieve this, I study 4) how men and women perform and display their beauty, gender and class in public sites. Most previous studies of Lebanon’s beauty culture focus on the growing number of cosmetic surgery procedures; in contrast, my research addresses non-invasive beauty work.

Francesca Fontana

Major: Journalism    Faculty Mentor: Brent Walth
Project Title: Seeking Truth through Investigative Memoir

Abstract: My project seeks to define the emerging genre of the investigative memoir—memoirs, like David Carr’s The Night of The Gun, that use journalistic methods to report out one’s life and tell one’s story. In order to do so, I compare and contrast genres of memoir and autobiography with literary and narrative journalism, then analyze instances in which the genres have been blended in journalists writing memoir. I also analyze how each genre defines truth and how their respective authors set out to discover the truth in different ways. After conducting my research, I will use what I have learned to write a book proposal for my own investigative memoir about my father’s secret criminal past in Chicago, using public records, archives and interviews to report out formative events of my childhood. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the intersection of memoir and narrative journalism and each genre’s search for “truth.” This combination of genres has been scarcely discussed by scholars in my preliminary research thus far. Few attempts have been made to reconcile the two genre’s different definitions of truth – whether one person’s perception of an event is truer than another’s, and how authors can use public records and interviews to add credibility to their “unreliable narration” and get closer to unbiased fact.

Iago Bojczuk

Major: Media Studies   Faculty Mentor: HyeRyoung Ok
Project Title: Using the Social Media Potential in Post-Impeachment Brazil: Youth Action in Fostering Participatory Politics through Digital Memes

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to understand the relationship between youth and civic media practices in fostering political participation in Brazil during and after the 2016 impeachment proceedings against Brazil’s first woman 25 president Dilma Rousseff. The ongoing political scandals in Brazil, which empowered youth to use social media as a vehicle to share internet memes, suggest significant changes in participatory politics in the country. Within this context, participatory politics can be defined as interactive, peer-based acts through which individuals and groups seek to exert both voice and influence on issues of public concern. Despite being one of the largest democracies in the world, Brazil still has a long way to go in terms of diversifying its media sources in order to allow impactful youth participation in the public opinion. However, the number of Brazilian youth on the internet continues to increase as Brazil becomes one of the most active countries on social media, despite the economic recession. This new culture of increased participation indicates the beginning of a remarkable political transition in Brazil’s democratic history because it directly challenges the country’s long-standing dominant media, television. This diversification suggests a new era of civic engagement that fuels discussions on social media and expands them into the public sphere. Therefore, this research will describe the various roles that social media and internet memes increasingly play in empowering youth in Brazil to engage in civic and political discussions within the context of the impeachment and participatory politics.

Keegan Williams-Thomas

Major: Political Science   Faculty Mentor: Mark Whalan
Project Title: Cinematic Adaptations of Modernist Texts: Formal Re-experimentation in the Mid-20th Century

Abstract: Film scholar Gilberto Perez argued that difficulties in cinematic adaptation emerge because modernist culture and literature emphasize an inherent tension in film, between its reflective nature (representation) and creative nature (imagination). This project looks at the 1967 adaptation of Ulysses, a 1969 adaptation of “The Reivers”, the 1971 adaptation of “Death in Venice” and a 1983 made-for-television adaptation of “To The Lighthouse”, focusing on what techniques were utilized by cinematic adapters to try to either accommodate the interiorization of narrative and experimentation with time in these works, or to restructure the basic plot or nature of the text in an effort to work around it. Looking at adaptations of a range of modernist writers (Joyce, Faulkner, Mann and Woolf), it is possible to identify an array of methods used in the filmmaking to replicate the elements of literary modernism which are often considered most difficult to portray on film. By studying efforts to bridge the exterior or voyeuristic aspects of film as a medium and the emphasized internal narrative complexity of Modernist novels, we can gain a better understanding of these mediums and these texts. Though this research examines direct correlations between text and film, the central focus is in new meanings and techniques which emerge in the transition from novel to feature film.

2016 HURF Recipients

Amanda Perkins

Major: History    Faculty Mentor: Trond Jacobsen
Project Title: Masculinist or Humanist? An Analysis of Rhetoric in College Debate

Abstract: The National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) tends to be male dominated and those who do not identify as men are a definitive minority. As a representative of the University of Oregon in collegiate debate, I have consistently observed a culture of masculinity. It is my perception that the most successful teams competitively are generally those who engage in debate in a masculine way by using aggressive techniques in their logic and language. I have researched feminist theories of argumentation and rhetoric and using these works, I have formulated ideas about what types of argumentation and rhetoric are gendered masculine. At the David Frank Tournament of Scholars in February 2016, I facilitated a focus group with debaters on the NPDA circuit to diversify my perspective of how masculinity presents itself in the debate space. My theoretical research coupled with the focus groups have allowed me to create a unique inventory of recognizable ways masculinity presents itself in rhetoric and argumentation. With this information, I have watched various debate rounds and recorded specific observations about performances of masculinity within them using ethnographic research methods. This project culminates in a specific analysis of how masculinity exists within this space and how it correlates to competitive success.

Augustine Beard

Major: History     Faculty Mentor: Mark Carey
Project Title: The Enemy in the Forests: The Public Perception of Forest Fires in the Pacific Northwest 1933-1965

Awards Related to this Project:

2017 UO Libraries Undergraduate Research Award Winner

Abstract: Fire plays a vital role in the ecology of the Pacific Northwest. However, throughout most of the twentieth century, the National Forest Service promoted a strict policy of fire suppression that has disrupted the cyclical nature of fires and lead to the growth of “megafires” in the past few decades. For the most part, the National Forest Service and the timber industry both financially benefited from the suppression policies. While historians have discussed the relation between scientists, the timber and ranching industries, and the state, there has been little analysis of public perception as it relates to fire policy and the actors involved. Groups and campaigns like the Keep Oregon Green Association and Smokey Bear encompassed a broad range of representatives including environmentalists, politicians, private loggers, and scholars, developing quasi-state entities that emphasized the importance of timber capital and national security above all else. Using various sources such as records of the Keep Oregon Green Association, OSU Forestry School archives, and World War II propaganda posters, I argue that the wide range of organizers promoting a uniform conception of fire disallowed any other. Fire prevention campaigns and the extreme vilification of fire in the public eye were vital to developing the environmental narrative that ensured an unquestioned fire suppression policy for so long.

Brandi Wilkens

Major: Art History    Faculty Mentor: Akiko Walley
Project Title: Not Just a Pretty Face: 19th c. Japanese Courtesans and their influence in art exportation

Abstract: 19th century Japan was a time of momentous changes. The Edo period ended shortly after the country was opened to the West. The Meiji period, beginning in 1868, shows a society grappling with many changes. By examining 19th century woodblock prints and souvenir photography, I will examine Japanese courtesans, their reinvention in the 1870s as geisha, and their influence over art exportation. I will argue that these women were far more than common prostitutes, by exploring their rigorous training, and indicating in what ways they used their minds and business acumen to further their careers. These women were linked with Europeans due to their relationships with Dutch traders since the 16th century; courtesans provided the buffer between foreigners and the native Japanese population. Due to these close associations, courtesans were able to influence Japanese art exportation, both through woodblock prints and later through souvenir photography. The complications of time period differences, and the difficulties in acquiring the necessary language skills (both Japanese and European languages are required), has created an unfortunate lack of scholarship on this vibrant time of change and cultural exchange between Japan and the West. It is my goal to shed more light on the changing dynamics of these tumultuous interactions, while bringing these marginalized women to the forefront, where there is evidence of their involvement with Westerners.

Colin Takeo

Major: Music History    Faculty Mentor: Loren Kajikawa
Project Title: The People’s Music: Rhetoric and Musical Symbolism in the German Democratic Republic’s 1954 Musikfest des VDK

Abstract: After World War II, Germany had to be rebuilt. The artificial division of the country in 1949 made an already difficult task even more complicated. Although the Cold War period remains a dark memory for many, it also offers a glimpse into the process of constructing national and socialist cultural identity. The German Democratic Republic (GDR) began in earnest to promote a new societal consciousness in the 1950s, and redoubled their efforts after the 1953 Worker’s Uprising. In 1954, the GDR government and composers allied with the socialist cause began a new cultural campaign using musical events and the socialist-realist aesthetic to establish authority over the East German population. By promoting their own socialist aesthetic and combining it with German cultural traditions, they created a hybrid culture that co-opted patriotic prestige from German cultural icons while also promoting a revolutionary, anti-capitalist consciousness. To explore this campaign, I performed original research at state archives in Berlin and Leipzig. My primary sources were programs, internal documents, and musical works related to the Musikfest des VDK, a state-sponsored music festival held in Leipzig in 1954. The research has revealed that the Musikfest’s socialist-realist pieces heavily relied on rhetorical, extra-musical framing and cultural appropriation.

Samuel Rodgers

Major: English and Economics    Faculty Mentor: Courtney Thorsson
Project Title: James Baldwin Across Literary Forms

Abstract: My research focuses on the work of 20th-century American author and activist James Baldwin. Fifty years after his career started, our country is still facing a deeply troubling racial divide, and we consistently turn to Baldwin’s words to reconcile this divide, rather than the words of his contemporaries. Broadly, I wanted to know why. Specifically, I posit that this lasting political utility and cultural relevance stems from Baldwin’s adaptability to the various literary forms he uses to address these complex ideas around race and identity. I highlight three forms throughout my project, and analyze the ways in which Baldwin adapts the same general arguments to each.

The first section, on Baldwin’s Another Country, argues that the novel’s central metaphor of indebtedness is crucial for understanding Baldwin’s enduring approach to racial hatred. In the second section, I read two films that Baldwin appears in as extensions of his written work, and explicate the ways that these public appearances reiterate the underlying political element of his writing. The final section is on non-fiction, and here I draw comparisons between The Fire Next Time and Ta-Nahisi Coates’ 2015 book Between the World and Me. The collective goal of these three sections is to illustrate Baldwin’s rhetorical versatility, account for his current political utility, and redirect his value back into the literary context in which it originated.

Sarah Carey

Major: Philosophy   Faculty Mentor: Steven Brence
Project Title: Understanding the Violence of Colonial Relations: Depictions of the Algerian War in Contemporary

Abstract: In the past fifteen years, the Algerian War, long a taboo topic in France, has begun to receive attention in public discourse and mainstream media, including a number of recent films. In my work, I analyze five contemporary French films’ portrayals of the war, asking what these films say about the ways in which violence and oppressive colonial relations harm both the colonizers and the colonized. I engage critically with the theories of Albert Memmi, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus, and argue that these films simultaneously illustrate and complicate these philosophers’ theories of the colonizer as a perpetrator of violence. I argue that these films’ graphic portrayals of the degrading effects of extreme violence on colonizers and colonized alike challenge Franz Fanon’s theory of the essential, cathartic, and redeeming role of violence in revolutions. My research contributes to the slowly growing body of scholarly work on the Algerian War in a unique way, as I address these films philosophically and reveal how the war continues to inform French identity. Additionally, my research comes at a pivotal moment as France becomes increasingly involved in the growing conflicts in the Middle East and Northern Africa and is reminded of its colonial history. And finally, my research helps shed light on the effects of systematic oppression and violence on people in the world at large.